Responses to this message:
First let me start by re-explaining my column because I don't believe I did a very good job the first time. I did not mean to insult "Mr. Cranky" as much as I actually did. After reading my column over I found thati was more negative on him than I intended to be. He is still not a real reviewer but an entertainer none-the-less. Now for that Troll character who wrote that profane but almost humorous response to my column. First of all, calm down buddy. Next, were you really gouging your eyes with a fork, or maybe pacticing that little pulling the tongue out through the nostril trick? You obviously weren't reading my article very thoroughly. I never said "Mr. Cranky" hated everything. I said that he writes negative articles on every movie he sees, but still at least some of his reviews aren't totally true, but I won't take the time to explain because you didn't understand it the first time. You said that I wouldn't be a good movie reviewer myself which I did say in my column. Finally, before you tell someone to use a dictionary (well actually a fucking dictionary as troll so elequently put it) check your spelling first because you didn't do it the first time-i.e.- critizize-it's criticize. So if troll does in fact find this article, feel free to respond but please don't waste space by adding in vulgar and irrelevent descriptions which do nothing but make you seem more like an angry teenager rather than a person whose thoughts actually mattered. If you have no idea what I'm talking about than I wouldn't worry about it. Just exit out and forget you ever read all the way to the bottom of this article.
Responses to this message:
Post a response to this discussion thread