Post a response to this discussion thread
I'n disappointed in those crypto-communists and their comments.
Clearly Sandra was engaged in on the job training when she chained her non-productive employee to the pole. She was clearly within her rights as an employer and was probably engaged in some focusing and visualization sessions to properly train the ungrateful employee. And Sandra wasn't engaged in violence, this was training, as she--a free person in a great democracy--saw fit. Why should those pinkos in the government decide what violence is? Is it violence when a minister at a private school literally beats Jesus into his pupils? Of course not, because if his/her parents don't like it, they can change schools. Let the free market decide what violence is.
The kidnapping charge? Nonsense, obviously trumped up the by socialist government officials to suppress another believer in free enterprise. Did Sandra go to Mexico to get the girl? Then how could it be kidnapping.
The non-productive employee wasn't chained to a pole ALL the time. She couldn't have been and still done her maid work. You can't clean out a toilet with your bare hands and be chained to a pole in the back yard at the same time. How obvious, even to a non-Libertarian. She could have left at some point during her employment. Perhaps while Sandra was asleep. Stop making excuses for these welfare cases.
What's so tragic, from a Libertarian standpoint, is that all this excessive government regulation will make it too expensive for truck drivers to have maid service. Left to the laws of supply and demand, the free market could make child labor available to almost anyone with an income and a pole in their backyard. It's liberals and the government that make the American dream impossible.
FREE SANDRA!!!!
Post a response to this discussion thread