Post a response to this discussion thread
It uses the phrase "second most expensive movie PROJECT of all time" which is quite different from "most expensive FILM of all time after 'Titanic'." The IMDB's version was highly misleading.
Is it just me or is "The Fellowship of the Ring" an extremely lame name for a $63M film? (Not unlike "Phantom Menace," although I've gotten somewhat used to that one now that I more or less understand what it means. But let's face it, it's still quite cheesy.)
C. F. L.
Post a response to this discussion thread