Responses to this message:
Some might find my name and subject contradictory, but I assure you it is a coincidence, I had this name before the movie came out.
I think that most of you are really close-minded about this fine movie. People complain about the special effects being bad, but thats not what makes the film good. Like all good art, this movie is open for interpretation. This film has solicited a wide array of reactions, but that is what its purpose is. People point out things like how unbelieveable it is that they could start the planes after 1000 years, but what if they came up with a special powder or "spray" that is specially designed to conserve things like airplanes? There goes one of your arguments.
Responses to this message:
Post a response to this discussion thread