Post a response to this discussion thread
"Just because A = B does not prove that B implies A. Logical fallacy."
Actually, if A = B, then B does imply A.
A implies A. So if A = B, then saying that A implies A is equuivalent to saying that B implies A.
When two things are equal to each other, then either one implies the other one.
Anyway, regarding the article. If this was any other kind of product, all of the major enviornmental groups and enviornentalists would be screaming like crazy, and demanding that the product in question be banned. Environmentalists have argued in favor of banning many other kinds of things: plactic drink boxes, styrofoam, disposable diapers, etc. And when they tried to get CFCs banned, they didn't even want to give a tiny little exemption for the very small amount of CFCs that is used in the inhalers that are used by asthmatics.
But birth control pills are different. Because the radical left is obsessed with sex, and they don't want any government action that will reduce their ability to have sex. That's why they aren't treating birth control pills the same way they treated those other products.
By the way, you never responded to my response to your post on wind power last week.
http://www.mrcranky.com/movies/rookie/22.html
Post a response to this discussion thread