Post a response to this discussion thread
1. The first article you quoted from listed her wealth at $500 million.
2. You said "Theresa Heinz-Kerry officialy worth $1 billion".
3. This statement was not supported by the article.
4. I called you out on this.
5. You posted a completely different article which calculates her wealth to be somewhere between $900 million and $3 billion. This is fine, except for two things:
a. You have to provide the sources for your claims as you make them, not later. Not to do so is dishonest.
b. This is hardly an official statement of her wealth. It's a guess based on her last known fortune as of 1995. This still makes your claim a lie.
Why did you feel the need to throw "official" into your statement? Just presenting the articles that you already have would have been good enough. Why do you need to lie?
Post a response to this discussion thread
And check this out: The Top Posters' Page