Post a response to this discussion thread
How Morisson did:
--BEST PICTURE: 4.5
--BEST DIRECTOR: 4
--LEADING ACTOR: 3
--LEADING ACTRESS: 4
--SUPPORTING ACTOR: 3
--SUPPORTING ACTRESS: 4.5
--ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY: 1* (see below)
--ADAPTED SCREENPLAY: 3* (depends on how you want to grade "Memento"; also, he listed "In the Bedroom" in the wrong category)
--*ANIMATED FEATURE FILM: 2
--*VISUAL EFFECTS: 2
--SOUND: 3
--SOUND EFFECTS EDITING: 0
--ART DIRECTION: 3
--EDITING: 3
--MAKEUP: 2
--COSTUME DESIGN: 4
--CINEMATOGRPAHY: 4
--ORIGINAL SCORE: 4
--FOREIGN FILM: 2
--ORIGINAL SONG: 3
TOTAL: 59 points.
How I did:
BEST PICTURE: 3.5
BEST DIRECTOR: 2.5
LEADING ACTOR: 4.5
LEADING ACTRESS: 3 (unless you reverse your decision on "right actor/wrong movie")
SUPPORTING ACTOR: 3 (unless you reverse your decision on "right actor/wrong movie")
SUPPORTING ACTRESS: 3
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY: 3* (see below)
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY: 4* (depending on how you want to rate my "Memento" nomination, if it acredits any points or not)
ANIMATED FEATURE FILM: 2
VISUAL EFFECTS: 2
SOUND: 2
SOUND EFFECTS EDITING: 0
ART DIRECTION: 4
EDITING: 4
MAKEUP: 2
COSTUME DESIGN: 4
CINEMATOGRPAHY: 4
ORIGINAL SCORE: 4
FOREIGN FILM: 2
ORIGINAL SONG: 4
Total score: 60.5, I think. Thus, I barely edge out Morisson, who clobbered me in the main awards, but I came back with the techies...
Post a response to this discussion thread