Post a response to this discussion thread
...you keep coming back for more, Slithers.
Your lame and prdictable mis-characterization of me was, sadly, wanting. "Spoiled brat"? Nope. "Rugged Individualist". I don't care enough to address your inconsequential and beside-the-issue "points".
No score for you, Drusilla.
"Of course I'm going to point out your failure to address my points -- otherwise don't bother to address me in the first place."
The problem, Slithers, is that tragically, you don't have the real or moral authority to force me to do anything, because of your complete failure to address anything substantive, and your penchant for making unsupported, gratuitous assertions that in no way, shape or form resemble a reasoned argument. That frees me from the need to respond to anything in your tiresome blather-sessions except as I see fit.
"Predictably, instead of providing any explanations to counter my irrefutable points, you merely state that: your comment WAS sarcastic, that your vacuous reference to Lewis Carroll WAS sensible."
Again, you are completely missing the point-you are too damned stupid and/or inexperienced in pop-culture to get the gag, and you have obviously kept your Carrolling endeavors to the Cliff Notes version of "Alice". Again, I entreat you to read a book about Carroll, or, if you can't muster the brains to figure out what the little black squiggles on the pages are, get someone to read it to you.
"I'm afraid you have much to learn about reasoned argument, and I fear it is your lot to be forever exposed as a clown."
Tragically, Slithers, you would not know a "reasoned argument" if it walked up to you and bit you on the nutsack. This thread is a perfect example.
"As to your laughable protestaions (sic) of innocence on the charge of bigotry, you are either simply a shamed liar, or too sociopathic to understand the offensiveness of your own comments. Attempting to smear others and shift attention will not redeem you either, Bigot-Boy."
Sorry, Mr. Anti-Semite, but the game don't play that way; you have more than proven my point that you are the bigot in this thread, not I. Try something new, Racist-Boy. Stop projecting your faults onto me.
>>>"I have been known to speak out against those persons who deliberately use terror against the innocent, such as certain Arab seperatist groups in Israel (for example)."<<<
"On the contrary, you have been known to use most hateful language to refer to stone-throwing Arab children."
You mean the "children" (many of whom were described as being in their late teens, and hardly "children" in a meaningful sense) who are used as dupes and shields by murderous terrorist organizations? Those *children*?
"These, I suppose, you would term 'terrorists'. Spare me the disengenuous drivel, the Israelis are by no means 'innocent victims'"
The children in schoolbuses that have a tendency to be blown up by Arab terrorists most certainly are.
"having driven an entire population off its rightful lands, massacred a whole refugee camp of Palestinians, tortured political prisoners, used excessive force (condemned internationally),broken international law and US treaty obligations..."
Prove that. Prove it all, or shut up. I demand cites in this matter, because my readings show that these so-called "treaty obligations" actually have no legal substance. C'mon, Big Boy, you've been making nothing but gratuitous assertions, show me up with URLs and quotes from binding legal documents.
Oh, the only citation that I can verify, thanks to Shakesmear, was the massacre at Deir Yassin, where something like a hundred or so Palestinians were killed by units of Irgun and Lehi fighters on April 9, 1948. That was over 50 years ago,and was not the policy of the naescent Israeli government, nor was it endorsed by the average Jewish person.
Here's a quote from a monograph on the subject:
"Account 5: Two Haganah Photographers. Haganah broadcaster Harry Levin, later an Israeli consul in the United States, published a recollection from his diary of the period. He related that two unnamed photographers from the Haganah reported entering Deir Yassin with the Red Cross representative. He met them after their visit and refers to them only by initials "I." and "H."
"I spoke with two, I. and H., who went [to Deir Yassin] with the Red Cross as Haganah photographers. I was too shaken to say anything. H. told me he saw a large pile of burned and half-burned bodies in a pit; another pile of children's bodies, about 16 of them. In a room of one house were the bodies of a woman and a child; in a second room the bodies of two villagers and two uniformed Syrians. . . .
Most Jews I have spoken with are horrified. Some still refuse to believe it. (HL 59)"
"I suppose you would have everyone believe that those old Palestinain (sic) women bystanders who were killed when the Israeli Army (not some radical fundamentalist splinter group) rocketed those ragheaded sandnigger terrorists in their car were legitimate targets, eh?"
1) I have never used the terms "sandnigger" or "raghead", as I find them offensive and racist, except in a sarcastic or satirical way.
2) Please provide something more than "when they did this" or "They did that" examples, please; this fight has been going on for 50+ years, and I need something to place them in context. I'm afraid thet you will have to provide some reputable sources for these claims.
"What about tanks firing shells into apartment blocks with innocent families living in them, or snipers targeting young stone-throwers with kill-shots to the head?"
Cites, please.
"Oh yeah, the Israelis are fucking saints, no question. Excessive force? Nah."
Actually, I have never supported that position...but facts just get in your way, don't they? In this thread, I have made at least one reference to the fact that the Israelis are not blameless. Ignore me at your peril, beccause I'm more than happy to show you up for the brain-dead peon that you are.
(quoting myself)
"Not that the Israelis are 100% angels, either, but considering the siege mindset that has been fostered there for over 50 years of struggle with forces that want to kill them all, and the situation under which many Jews came to Israel in the first place (right after WWII, after either having fled Nazi Germany or having been in the death-camps)...you get the picture."
http://www.mrcranky.com/movies/shadowofthevampire/33/25.html
Also, thanks for dropping the pretense, if only for a moment, that you are a rational person, fuckface.
Eat it.
>>>"...you are too lackwitted [sic] to make these comments as as [sic] one cohesive post.."<<<
"Also predictably, you even admitted to "gloating" over the cardinal sin of multiple posting, yet it seems that you can not even devise a coherent sentence".
So I missed an "as" in the proof-reading stage. AND...?
Typo-whore.
Nothing wrong with gloating...when you're beating the tar out of someone. Since you always lose, you're the one who shouldn't try to gloat.
"You obviously lack the wit to realise that there is no such word as "lackwitted" (don't bother telling me this is another one of your absurd "neologisms").
Nothing wrong with "lackwit"; it does exist, even if only because I may have coined the term. It is perfectly descriptive of your mental state-without neologisms, the language stagnates and sinks into linguistic decrepitude. Just think of me as Crankyland's resident Shakespeare.
BTW, using your logic, I should be twitting you about "fuckwit". Tsk, again, you sink down below the intellectual RADAR.
"Of course, your homerotic mind would conjure up an image of an ejeculating penis, wouldn't it Sodomite-Boy? Yet further evidence to support my claim."
So, only homosexuals have ejaculations? Gee, how has the human species been able to carry on all these millenia? Stop projecting, Honey.
I love it when you step on the banana-peel that way.
"By the way, Mr Cranky's site does not exclusively review pop-culture films, philistine."
Ah, but the people who inhabit the fora tend to have a strong sense of pop-culture-you, however, have no sense of anything, except your hate-filled anti-Semitic screeds.
"If my posts are merely "boring screeds", why then do you continue to read them?"
Again, you either fail to "get" it, or are being disingenuous; *you* bore me. While your screeds are often tiresome, and regularly just the same thing regurgitated over and over again, occasionally, you provide me with, as I have said previously, a laugh or two.
"You, I can happily say, do not bore me, you continually amuse me. Go on Bozo, let's see you walk into another cream pie."
As soon as you wipe the greasepaint and whipped topping from your own mug, Clarabelle, I'll think about doing it, as an act of charity towards you.
Re: "Extremist groups"-You mean, Captain Disingenuous, "extremist groups", like the PLO, HizbAllah, ANO, the government of Libya, HAMAS, Islamic Jihad, etcetera, etcetera, and so forth?
Of, course, the rest of your "arguments" are of the "You're a FAG!" sort.
What a clever little boy you are.
Post a response to this discussion thread