Post a response to this discussion thread
(1) Of course you continue to fail to address my pulling the rug from under you regarding the Lewis Carroll comment. You are a pathetic fuckwit, and I'm glad to have rubbed your face in it.
(2) You continue to - I think "ape me" is the phrase I'm looking for - with self-deflating results. For example:
"As to your laughable protestations (sic) of innocence on the charge of bigotry, you are either simply a shamed liar, or too sociopathic to understand the offensiveness of your own comments. Attempting to smear others and shift attention will not redeem you either, Bigot-Boy."
You should of course bracket "sic" in square bracket, otherwise you are indicating that it was me who inserted the word. If you are going to pose as an intellectual, at least understand the basic rules of academic writing.
(3) "having driven an entire population off its rightful lands, massacred a whole refugee camp of Palestinians, tortured political prisoners, used excessive force (condemned internationally),broken international law and US treaty obligations..."
Prove that. Prove it all, or shut up. I demand cites in this matter, because my readings show that these so-called "treaty obligations" actually have no legal substance. C'mon, Big Boy [see 6], you've been making nothing but gratuitous assertions, show me up with URLs and quotes from binding legal documents."
You are constantly talking out of your "ass", being entirely ignorant on the subject and statements you are refuting. I cite examples listed in reports by the Congressional Research Service, a government body that prepares research reports for Congress in regards to treaty violations. As for the other incidents I referred to, if you paid attention to CNN or other news services, you would not need to ask for citations. I never grow tired of stating this: you are an ignorant fuckwit.
CRS reports:
http://www.fas.org/man/crs/82-008.htm
http://www.fas.org/man/crs/85-066.htm
The second U.S.-Israeli disagreement over U.S. assistance involves the U.S. restriction against transferring U.S. arms to third countries without U.S. permission. Controversy has arisen over Israeli sales of spare parts to Iran and of larger items to Argentina. The United States, according to reports, vetoed the Israeli sale of Kfirs and Mysteres with General Electric J-79 jet engines to Latin American countries because the United States was trying to avoid an arms race in the region. Israel has asked that the United States relax its restriction because Israel gains revenues (over $1 billion in 1980, according to reports) and friends from its arms sales. (See section on Technology Transfer to China, above.)
The Espionage Affairs. In 1985, U.S.-Israeli relations were rocked by two spy cases. A Richard Smyth was indicted in California for illegally exporting 800 Krytons to an Israeli company. Krytons are high speed electronic switches that can be used to detonate nuclear weapons. Israel claimed that it was not aware of needed export licenses for the devices. Smyth is reported to be at large. On November 21, 1985, Jonathan Pollard, a U.S. naval intelligence employee, and his wife Ann Pollard were charged with selling classified documents to Israel for $2,500 per month over an 18-month period. The Israeli government said the spy network, headed by former Israeli intelligence officer Raphael Eitan, was a renegade operation. In March 1987, Pollard was sentenced to life in prison, and his wife to two consecutive 5-year terms. Four Israelis were also indicted, including Israeli Air Force Col. Aviem Sella. Israel promoted both Sella and Eitan, although Sella's command of a major air base and promotion were rescinded after negative U.S. reactions. Israelis continue to complain that Pollard received an excessively harsh sentence. Ann Pollard was released in 1990, and moved to Israel where she divorced Jonathan Pollard.
In addition to the Smyth and Pollard cases, U.S. Customs agents raided 3 U.S. companies on December 12, 1985, to seize materials describing a metallurgical process for tank guns that were being transferred illegally to Israel. In another case, 3 Israelis were arrested on April 22, 1986, for conspiring to sell arms to Iran. On May 15, 1986, 2 Israelis were arrested in New York on another weapons selling scheme. On July 8, 1986, U.S. Customs agents searched 3 U.S. companies for information about a plan to transfer technical information for cluster bombs to Israel. An Illinois company said on August 8, 1986, that Israelis tried to steal data on aerial reconnaissance cameras. Israel denied any connection with any of these cases.
The State Department announced on April 2 that a team that visited Israel on March 21 found no evidence of an unauthorized transfer of Patriot technology to China. But, an Inspector-General's report released the same day said Israel did transfer other equipment and technology to other countries without proper U.S. authorization. The story resurfaced on October 11, 1993, when NBC news reported that Israel sold billion of dollars worth of military equipment, including U.S. sophisticated technology, to China, and reappeared again in October 1995 when it was reported that China had Lavi technology (Israel built a prototype Lavi aircraft with U.S. money and technology).
Allegations of Misuse of U.S. Aid
The United States stipulates that U.S. aid funds cannot be used in the occupied territories. Over the years, some have suggested that Israel may be using U.S. assistance to establish Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. Israel denies that it uses U.S. aid funds for settlements in the occupied territories. Because U.S. economic aid is given to Israel as direct government-to-government budgetary support without any specific project accounting, and money is fungible, there is no way to tell how Israel uses U.S. aid. Israel provides an annual letter to the U.S. Agency for International Development stating that the economic funds are used to service Israel's debt to the United States (approximately $1 billion per year).
Also, the United States stipulates that U.S. military equipment provided through the FMS program can be used only for internal security or defensive purposes, and that U.S. weapons and equipment cannot be transferred to a third country without U.S. approval. (See Sections 3 and 4 of the Arms Export Control Act, P.L. 90-629, as amended.) In 1978, 1979, and 1981, the executive branch notified Congress that Israel "may have violated" U.S.-Israeli agreements by using U.S. weapons for non-defensive purposes, and in 1982, the United States suspended shipments of so-called cluster bombs after allegations that Israel violated an agreement on the use of the bombs during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. In the 1978, 1979, and 1981 instances, the Administrations took no further action. The cluster bomb ban remains in effect. Israel maintains that the weapons were used for defensive purposes.
In 1982 testimony before Congress, executive branch officials said Israel transferred U.S. arms to Iran and the "South Lebanon Army" without U.S. permission, and similar charges emerged in 1992 concerning Israeli transfers of U.S. technology or equipment to China, South Africa, Chile, Ethiopia, and other countries. A U.S. Defense Department team went to Israel in late March 1992, to investigate the alleged transfer of Patriot missile technology to China, but announced on April 2 that it found no evidence of an unauthorized transfer. The State Department Inspector-General released a report on April 2, 1992, that suggested that Israel had transferred other U.S. arms technology without U.S. permission.
(4) "… thanks for dropping the pretense, if only for a moment, that you are a rational person, fuckface."
In what way, fuckwit?
(5) "Nothing wrong with 'lackwit'; it does exist, even if only because I may have coined the term."
There is something wrong with you babble, just as there is something wrong with your sentence, you fuckwit.
"BTW, using your logic, I should be twitting you about "fuckwit". Tsk, again, you sink down below the intellectual RADAR."
Wrong again. "Fuckwit" is a commonly used derogatory term, and as such is recognizable, unlike your babble. Scratch up another lesson in common sense English.
(6) "Of course, your homoerotic mind would conjure up an image of an ejaculating penis, wouldn't it Sodomite-Boy? Yet further evidence to support my claim."
"So, only homosexuals have ejaculations [sic]? Gee, how has the human species been able to carry on all these millenia [sic]? Stop projecting, Honey."
What the fuck are you talking about? In answer to your irrelevant statement - obviously not, but homosexuals do conjure up homoerotic imagery. "Honey" - what a give-away, as is "Big Boy".
(6) "Re: 'Extremist groups'-You mean, Captain Disingenuous, 'extremist groups', like the PLO, HizbAllah [sic], ANO, the government of Libya, HAMAS [sic], Islamic Jihad [no such group], etcetera, etcetera, and so forth [laughable line of gibberish from The King and I?]?"
Again, what the fuck are you talking about? How is this relevant to my berating you over your mistaken use of the term "separatist"?
(7) "What a clever little boy you are."
What a STUPID little boy you are. You ignorant, fuckwitted sodomite.
Post a response to this discussion thread