01/09/03: Re: Bush bashing

Posted By: Viscount_Omega


North Korea is much less likely to attack the U.S. unprovoked than Saddam. They don't have the same motivation. Simple as that. And the whole idea of the campaign is to prevent him from getting nukes--not an issue of whether he already has them--and disarming his chem., bio., capabilities.

Face it, first you were wrong about whether Cranky's Bush bashing was just that. Then you changed the subject and now you're wrong about the threat of terrorist Iraq, and it being only about oil. How many times do you have to be wrong before you do us all a favor and commit suicide?

And here's a little article about Clinton and N. Korea you might not like too much.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&no de=&contentId=A14315-2002Oct24&notFound=true


o Post a response to this discussion thread

Go to: Talk to Her | Message | Previous Response |