Trees Lounge

Bomb Rating: 

"Trees Lounge" is deadly dull, uninspiring, slowly paced and has a plotthat can be simply described as "man discovers something about himself."

To think I had some respect for Steve Buscemi.

Let's face it, the guy is like the acting Buddha of independent film. He's been in three of the Coen brothers' films ("Miller's Crossing," "Barton Fink" and "Fargo"), Tarantino's "Reservoir Dogs," Tom DeCillo's "Living in Oblivion," Robert Rodriguez's "Desperado" and Jim Jarmusch's "Mystery Train." You'd think he'd glean some insights from these people -- retaining their best secrets and discarding their worst.

Unfortunately, Steve's done exactly the opposite in telling the story of a 31-year-old unemployed bar patron, Tommy Basilio (Buscemi). "Trees Lounge" is deadly dull, uninspiring, slowly paced and has a plot that can be simply described as "man discovers something about himself." Sadly, Steve would have been better off making the plot "man discovers third foot growing out of rectum" for all the interest produced by Tom's self-discovery quest.

What Tom discovers is that he's an utter loser. He's also a complete moron because it takes him two hours to figure out that he's an utter loser. Let me save everybody some time here: If you spend most of your life in a bar, have no friends, no job and run around looking for 17-year-olds (Chloe Sevigny) to screw, you're probably a loser. Although if you're looking for 13-year-olds, you might not be a loser -- you might be Roman Polanski.

To spread the word about this Trees Lounge review on Twitter.

To get instant updates of Mr. Cranky reviews, subscribe to our RSS feed.
0 Comments

Like This Trees Lounge Review? Vote it Up.

0

Rate This Movie:

Average: 5 (1 vote)

Other Cranky Content You Might Enjoy

  • When normal people get sick of doing things, they usually try to do something that makes them less sick (this is Mr. Cranky's Rule of Life #4, by the way). Not director Tom DeCillo.

  • Writer/director Wes Anderson is teetering on the precipice between humorous and interesting on one side and bizarre and meaningless on the other.

  • This is the kind of film that appears to have been written on a roll of toilet paper by a preschooler during a particularly short dump.