Post a response to this discussion thread
OK, IT WASN'T THE BEST VAMPIRE MOVIE, BUT IT WASN'T THE WORST THAT I HAVE HAD THE PLEASURE OF SHELLING OUT SIX BUCKS FOR. IT WAS BETTER THAN BLADE. AT LEAST JAMES WOODS HAD BETTER ONE LINERS THAN SNIPES. THE ONY THING THAT BLADE HAD WAS THE SPECIAL EFFECTS. ALL I'M DOING IS DEFENDING A WORK BY JOHN CARPENDER THAT MOST OF MY FELLOW CRIICS WILL DO NOTHING BUT CUT IT DOWN. WHO CARES THAT HE BEATS WOMEN AND DEFENCELESS PRIESTS. THATS THE PART THAT MAKES IT MORE REALLISTIC. WHO CARES THAT MOST OF THE CHARACTERS IN THE FILM ARE REDNECKS. IT'S A FUCKING MOVIE! YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT KIND OF FILM IT WAS BEFORE YOU WALKED IN IT. IN CLOSING IF YOU LIKE A VAMPIRE THAT IS FAGISH THAT RUNS AROUND WITH DESIGNER SUITS WHINNING ABOUT HOW MISSERIBLE THEIR LIFE IS DON'T SEE IT. ON THE OTHER HAND IF YOU LIKE A KICKASS TAKE NO PRISONERS BLOOD AND GORE FEST ie "FROM DUSK TILL DAWN" YOU WILL LIKE THIS FILM.
Post a response to this discussion thread