02/16/98: The Moderator Between the Trask-Vegeta War

Posted By: The Ranter


Hmm...where to begin, where to begin...

Well, I suppose I will analyze Trask's original post (since Trask doesn't seem to understand what he said and Vegeta is mistaken on a couple of things.

"I give you Cranky's supposed "brilliance". Boy did he poor ketchup on his words and eat them wholeheartedly, going back for a second helping!"

1. Poor is spelled "pour" and if you're going to target someone else's intelligence for an insult, be sure to spell right.

"Hey, stupid, next time you turn on your television after you have stopped pouring salt on snails, try turning it to CNN."

1. Another strike at intelligence, but this time well spelled. 2. CNN has admitted to "advocacy journalism" (slanting the story to conform to the certain reporter's views) and they, in fact, promote it, (not getting into a political battle), so technically, they could be slanting someone of the Lewinsky-Clinton footage (especially the dark-beret hugging scene...if anyone actually did the research, she had just become head of his fan club in 1996 and was entitled to a free dinner and accompanying him on a rally).

"Our president has been accused of having an affair!"

1. "Accused" is the key word there. Accused... 2. At best, she only gave him fellatio, which, in Black's Law Handbook, is not official sex, therefore, it cannot be adultery, omitting the "affair". 3. From testimony with previous boyfriends, she is a known compulsive liar. Want to check up on this? She claims to have given him a blow-job that weekend when he was in Palm Springs...the same weekend he hurt his leg and went to the hospital for most of Saturday...not to mention the fact that she was logged in back at the White House that day (and, yes, there is surveillance footage of her being there that day).

"With a girl named Monica Lewinsky! In the film, the president hugs a woman with a dark beret on. IN REAL LIFE, THE SAME THING HAPPENED!!! Now, I don't know if you have noticed this or not, but in the film, a supposed war starts to distract the public."

1. No argument here.

"Come on, Cranky! Wake the fuck up and smell the coffee!"

1. Yes, I too have to quote the Crankster: "Profanity is the crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker."

"What the hell do you think is going down in Iraq?"

1. So far, nothing has happened in Iraq, besides the fact that Mr. Hussein doesn't want them to see his jolly warheads that he would be delighted to shove so far up Clinton's ass, he would be spitting plutonium for a week, but that's beside the point.

"Clinton is trying to distract the public!"

1. Two words: any proof?

"Now, it is highly unlikely that the war is fake, but next time you TRY to take down a film by saying that something could NEVER happen, don't ever think that it might be possible in the future."

1. Whoa, that's a mouthful!
2. Run-on sentences and several capitalization errors, but I won't be so petty as to pick on grammar. 3. As I said before, there is no war, yet. 4. He did take down the film...it's just up to the people to agree with him. 5. Cranky, being the intelligent wise-ass that he is, probably knows that it could happen in the future. 6. As with all movies (even the ones he likes), he puts them down - horribly, so don't take it so seriously.

-The Ranter


o Post a response to this discussion thread

Go to: the Wag the Dog forum | Message | Previous Response |