07/07/05: Yes I know Snopes Coaster

So that means:

-Jamie McIntyre's report was forged?

-Snopes is now the ultimate authority on 9/11?

Regarding that National Review 'article:' since when is some pundit's column supposed to refute claims made on sound observation? I couldn't see any damage to the Pentagon's lawn, nor could I see large pieces of debris.

The National Geographic documentary "Seconds From Disaster" at least tried to make it look as if they had done their homework. But even they couldn't convincingly combine these elements: if the plane's wings broke off before it hit the Pentagon, why are there no pieces of wing outside? Did the crash cause a vaccuum that sucked up all the pieces inside the Pentagon, where they were devoured untill no rescue worker could find: engines, luggage and remains of passengers?

Regarding James S. Robbins: I cannot believe you take this person seriously. He even admits in this piece he never read the book, he's "waiting for the movie to come out." Hooha! That may be a sufficient rebuttal for a late night party debate where contestants have had a couple of drinks too many but you can't expect me to be convinced by this clown?

Without giving counter evidence or even rational explanations, he goes on to equate Messyan with *Holocaust deniers*. Then he rants on that there is ample evidence for the Holocaust GODDAMMIT we're not talking about or disputing the Holocaust!

"I was there. I saw it. That is my entire rebuttal." - And to anyone who doesn't believe this character: YOU = JEW HATER.

If he can't keep the Holocaust out of the Pentagon debate, all he has to say is his claim that he was there and he saw it. Somehow I don't buy his story.

But hey, anything better than some crackpot story from a Jew-hating, Holocaust denying FRENCHMAN whose writings are a slap in the face of all decent and God-fearing Americans. For convenience sake I'll just shove you in with those decent and God-fearing Americans, Coaster.

Post a response to this discussion thread