07/07/05: I think you see what you want to see

You should get to know me. I don't trust the government. I don't trust the cops. I don't flow with the establishment. Just ask my kids of whom I'm a consistent source of embarrassment.

I've done work with structures. I do work with concrete. I am presently working with airplanes. I believe, if you'll research other engineering papers on the subject besides the one I've cited, you'll see there is indeed a consensus on the mechanics of the failures of WTC 1 & WTC 2.

I was in the military and guarded a crash site in New Hampshire where a fighter jet flew into the side of a granite mountain. We were not told a thing other than there would be dire consequences if we allowed the site to be disturbed before the investigation team released us. Dude, there wasn't a piece of debris bigger than your thumb. All we saw was shreds of aluminum. There was nothing on that site that looked like a part of a plane. I am totally not bothered by the lack of plane parts cited by the Pentagon attack nay sayers. As the Snopes site showed, there was plane debris visible.

The reasons you give and your sources give for what you've stated either ignore facts in evidence or, as in the case of that French asshole, just make up stuff.

The reason WTC 7 collapsed is because it was damaged by debris from the collapsing WTC 1 & WTC 2. This was so freakin' obvious from the pictures and eye witness accounts that I didn't even know that the cause of its collapse was debatable.

Post a response to this discussion thread