Post a response to this discussion thread
So why rely on some right-wing pundit whose main point is that if you don't believe him, you're a Holocaust denier?
You as an American may think calling someone a Holocaust denier is no big deal, but I immediately suspect someone of being a neo-nazi when that person denies the Holocaust. You know, there's even worse than Holocaust deniers. There's Revisionists who claim that the destruction camps were in fact pretty good accomodations with even a *swimming pool* to be used by detainees. I don't know which person would insult me more. The one who denies the Holocaust outright, or the one who says it wasn't all that bad...
Regarding the granite mountain example: the Pentagon hardly qualifies as a mountain, does it? I was always under the impression it was made from reinforced concrete but if you say it's a solid granite structure I don't know.
When a large airliner crashes into a modern building, it looks something like this:
http://tinyurl.com/cet3z
And why is it that the WTC buildings are the only steel structure buildings to collapse due to fires? If the fires were hot enough to melt steel, how come you could see people standing in the windows waving to helicopters and people below?
The WTC builders said it was guaruanteed to withstand the impact of a 707 jetliner. A 757 is about the size of a 707, is it not?
Post a response to this discussion thread
And check this out: The Top Posters' Page